Common Violations of Solid Principles in C# Code


Breaking SRP can lead to bloated classes with multiple responsibilities. Splitting responsibilities into separate classes enhances code readability and maintainability

Interested in learning about SOLID Principles  in C#?

1. Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)

Violating OCP can make code fragile and hard to extend. Designing modules that are open for extension but closed for modification promotes code reusability.

Why should you utilize SOLID design principles?

2. Open/Closed Principle (OCP)

Violations of LSP result in code that is not substitutable with its base types. Ensuring derived types adhere to the same behavior as their base types improves code reliability.

3. Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)

Curious to explore the advantages of  SOLID Principles?

When interfaces are not tailored to specific client needs, it leads to clients depending on unnecessary methods. Creating smaller and more focused interfaces prevents this issue.

4. Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)

Looking for more information on SOLID Principles  in C#?

Failing to depend on abstractions rather than concrete implementations makes code tightly coupled and difficult to test. Applying DIP promotes loose coupling and testability.

5. Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)

Why should you utilize SOLID design principles?

Interested in Learning about SOLID Principles in C#?

Explore a comprehensive blog by InterviewBit on SOLID Principles in C#, and discover how implementing them can elevate code quality and maintainability.

Looking to Level up your C# Skills?

Sign up for Scaler's free masterclasses and events to learn about the latest trends in the IT industry and become a pro.  Don't hesitate any longer, register today!