Understanding the Key Differences

Sanity Testing  vs.  Smoke Testing

1. Goal Comparison

Smoke Testing aims to verify stability, ensuring the critical functionalities work. Sanity Testing focuses on rationality, checking if proposed functionalities meet expectations.

Learn more about how smoke testing differs from  sanity testing!

2. Performers

Software Developers or Testers perform Smoke Testing, while Testers alone take the reins in Sanity Testing.

Learn more about how smoke testing differs from  sanity testing!

3. Purpose Breakdown

Smoke Testing ensures critical system functionalities, whereas Sanity Testing verifies newly added functionalities like bug fixes.

Learn more about how smoke testing differs from  sanity testing!

Smoke Testing is a subset of acceptance testing, while Sanity Testing is a subset of regression testing.

4. Subset Classification

Learn more about how smoke testing differs from  sanity testing!

5. Documentation Distinction

Smoke Testing is documented or scripted, while Sanity Testing operates without formal scripts.

Learn more about how smoke testing differs from  sanity testing!

6. Scope of Verification

Smoke Testing covers the entire system end-to-end, while Sanity Testing focuses on specific components.

Learn more about how smoke testing differs from  sanity testing!

Learn more about how smoke testing differs from  sanity testing!

Smoke Testing ensures critical functionalities, while Sanity Testing validates bug fixes and new features.

7. Testing Objectives

Check out InterviewBit's blog for a comprehensive overview of what is smoke testing and sanity testing, their key features and how they differ.

How does Smoke Testing differ from Sanity Testing?

Scaler  Data Science & Machine Learning Program!

Ready to level up your data science skills? Join Scaler to become a master of data science and machine learning. Book a FREE LIVE CLASS now.